In Vitro Comparison of Cuspal Fracture Resistances of Posterior Teeth Restored with Various Adhesive Restorations


1. Eakle WS, Maxwell EH, Braly BV. Fractures of posterior teeth in adults. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:215–218.

2. Gher ME Jr, Dunlap RH, Anderson MH, Kuhl LV. Clinical survey of fractured teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;114:174–177.

3. Cavel WT, Kelsey WP, Blankenau RJ. An in vitro study of cuspal fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:38–42.

4. Khera SC, Carpenter CW, Vetter JD, Staley RN. Anatomy of cusps of posterior teeth and their fracture potential. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:139–147.

5. Ulusoy N, Nayyar A, Morris CF, Fairhurst CW. Fracture durability of restored functional cusps on maxillary nonvital premolar teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:330–335.

6. Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, Navarro M, Soares F. Fracture strength of human teeth cavity preparations. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:419–422.

7. Goel VK, Khera SC, Gurusami S, Chen RSC. Effect of cavity depth on stresses in a restored tooth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:174–183.

8. Sheth JJ, Fuller JL, Jensen ME. Cuspal deformation and fracture resistance of teeth with dentin adhesives and composites. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:560–569.

9. Grimaldi JR, Hood JAA. Lateral deformation of tooth crown under axial cuspal loading. J Dent Res 1973;52:584.

10. Staninec M, Holt M. Bonding of amalgam to tooth structure: Tensile adhesion and microleakage tests. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:397–402.

11. Eakle WS, Staninec M, Lacy AM. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:257–260.

12. Eakle WS, Staninec M, Yip RL, Chawez MA. Mechanical retention versus bonding of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:351–354.

13. Al-Duwairi Y, Hadj-Hamdou R. Amalgam restorations: A new approach. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:138–140.

14. Morin D, De Long R, Douglas WH. Cusp reinforcement by the acid etch technique. J Dent Res 1984;63:1075–1078.

15. Gelb MN, Barouch E, Simonsen RJ. Resistance to cusp fracture in Class II prepared and restored premolars. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:184–185.

16. Reel DC, Mitchel RJ. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:177–180.

17. Eakle WS. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded composite restorations. J Dent Res 1986;65:149–153.

18. Stampalia LL, Nicholls JI, Brudvik JS, Jones DW. Fracture resistance of teeth with resin-bonded restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:694–698.

19. Joynt RB, Wieczkowski G Jr, Klockowski R, Davis EL. Effects of composite restorations on resistance to cuspal fracture in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:431–435.

20. Wieczkowski G Jr, Joynt RB, Klockowski R, Davis EL. Effects of an incremental versus bulk fill technique on the resistance to cuspal fracture of teeth restored with posterior composites. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:283–287.

21. Banks RG. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:619–626.

22. Livaditis GJ. Etched-metal resin-bonded intracoronal cast restorations. Part I: The attachment mechanism. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:267–273.

23. Milleding P, Örtengren U, Karlsson S. Ceramic inlay systems: Some clinical aspects. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:571–580.

24. Çötert HS, Öztürk B. Posterior bridges retained by resin-bonded cast-metal inlay retainers: A report of sixty cases followed for six years. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:697–704.

25. Stokholm R, Isidor F. Resin-bonded inlay retainer prostheses for posterior teeth. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:161–166.

26. Garber DH, Goldstein RE. Porcelain and Composite Inlays and Onlays. Esthetic Posterior Restorations. Chicago: Quintessence, 1988.

27. Pisü kin B, Gökay N, Demirci T. Comparison of the fracture strength of the posterior composites and amalgam restorations in Cl II preparations [in Turkish]. J Ege Univ Faculty Dent 1995;16:179–185.

28. Latta MA, Barkmeier WW. Bond strength of a resin cement to a cured composite inlay material. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:189–193.

29. Biederman JD. Direct composite resin inlay. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:249–253.

30. Assif D, Marshak BL, Pilo R. Cuspal flexure associated with amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:255–262.

31. Kohli S, Levine WA, Grisius RJ, Fenster RK. The effect of three different surface treatments on the tensile strength of the resin bond to nickel-chromium-beryllium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:4–8.

32. Atta MO, Smith BGN, Brown D. Bond strengths of three chemical adhesive cements adhered to a nickel-chromium alloy for direct bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:137–143.

33. Çötert HS, Öztürk B. Tensile bond strength of enamel-resin-metal joints. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:609–616.

34. Isidor F, Brøndum K. A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:140–144.

35. Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Roberson TM. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays. A four year study. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:1171–1181.

36. Hussein MA, Bradford EW, Charlton G. Effect of etching on the strength of aluminous porcelain jacket crowns. Br Dent J 1979;147:89–90.

37. Baez RJ, Blackman R. Glazing inside surface of castable ceramic crown segments to improve strength [abstr 2120]. J Dent Res 1988;67:378.

38. Kern M, Thompson VP. Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: Adhesive methods and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:240–249.