Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
World Journal of Orthodontics
WJO Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: ORTHODONTICS
ORTHODONTICS
The Art and Practice of Dentofacial Enhancement

Formerly World Journal of Orthodontics

Edited by
Rafi Romano, DMD, MSc (Editor-in-Chief)

ISSN 2160-2999 (print) / ISSN 2160-3006 (online)

Visit the ORTHODONTICS: The Art and Practice of Dentofacial Enhancement Facebook page

Publication:
Winter 2010
Volume 11 , Issue 4

Back
Share Abstract:

Influence Of The Cephalometric Characteristics On The Occlusal Success Rate Of Class Ii Malocclusions Treated With Nonextraction Or With Two Maxillary Premolar Extraction Protocols

Guilherme Janson, DDS, MSc, PhD /Tassiana Mesquita Simão, DDS, MSc, PhD/Sérgio Estelita Barros, DDS, MSc, PhD/Marcos Janson, DDS, MSc/Marcos Roberto de Freitas, DDS, MSc, PhD


PMID: 21490991

Aim: To compare the initial cephalometric characteristics of complete Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extractions and to verify their degree of influence on the occlusal success rate. Methods: A sample of 84 records from patients with complete Class II malocclusions was divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 31 patients treated with nonextraction at an initial mean age of 12.95 years, while group 2 included 53 patients treated with two maxillary premolar extractions at an initial mean age of 13.3 years. Initial and final occlusal statuses were evaluated on dental casts with Grainger’s Treatment Priority Index (TPI); the initial cephalometric characteristics were obtained on the pretreatment cephalograms. The initial cephalometric characteristics of the groups were compared by t test. A multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of all variables in the percentage of TPI reduction. Results: The pretreatment cephalometric characteristics of the two maxillary premolar extraction cases were a greater vertical growth pattern, greater max illary and mandibular incisor protrusion, greater maxillary incisor and molar dentoalveolar heights, and greater upper and lower lip protrusion than the nonextraction group. However, the regression analysis demonstrated that only the extraction protocol was significantly associated with the occlusal success rate in the groups. Conclusions: It was concluded that the initial cephalometric characteristics of the groups did not influence the occlusal success rate of the two treatment protocols investigated. World J Orthod 2010;11:e63–e71.

Key words: Class II malocclusion, treatment protocol, premolar extraction, cephalometry

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files.
This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site
to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2019 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog