Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
World Journal of Orthodontics
WJO Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: ORTHODONTICS
ORTHODONTICS
The Art and Practice of Dentofacial Enhancement

Formerly World Journal of Orthodontics

Edited by
Rafi Romano, DMD, MSc (Editor-in-Chief)

ISSN 2160-2999 (print) / ISSN 2160-3006 (online)

Visit the ORTHODONTICS: The Art and Practice of Dentofacial Enhancement Facebook page

Publication:
Spring 2007
Volume 8 , Issue 1

Back
Share Abstract:

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PROFILE CHANGES WITH 3 DIFFERENT DISTALIZATION MECHANICS

Korkmaz Sayinsu, DDS, PhD / Fulya Isik, DDS, PhD / Ayse Nur Ülgen, DDS, PhD

Pages: 37–44
PMID: 17373224

Aim: To compare the effects of 3 molar distalization appliances, the intraoral bodily molar distalizer, the Keles slider, and the acrylic cervical occipital appliance, from the viewpoint of skeletal and soft tissue changes. Material and methods: Lateral cephalometric films taken before and immediately after distalization of 51 patients comprised the study material of this investigation. The lateral cephalograms were digitized and measured with Dolphin Imaging 9.0. Results: The intraoral bodily molar distalizer showed the most forward movement of the lips, with respect to E-plane. The maxillary incisal proclination presented by the U1-SN angle revealed that the most prominent proclination was caused by the intraoral bodily molar distalizer, followed by the acrylic cervical occipital appliance. The appliance that showed the most vertical opening was the intraoral bodily molar distalizer, followed by the acrylic cervical occipital appliance. ANB is the only sagittal skeletal parameter with a change: an increase with the intraoral bodily molar distalizer. Conclusion: The most prominent soft tissue profile changes were observed with the intraoral bodily molar distalizer. The acrylic cervical occipital appliance and the Keles slider generated milder changes on the profile. When selecting the appropriate method for maxillary molar distalization, the initial soft tissue profile should be considered. World J Orthod 2007;8:37–44.

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files.
This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site
to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog