Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
World Journal of Orthodontics
WJO Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: ORTHODONTICS
ORTHODONTICS
The Art and Practice of Dentofacial Enhancement

Formerly World Journal of Orthodontics

Edited by
Rafi Romano, DMD, MSc (Editor-in-Chief)

ISSN 2160-2999 (print) / ISSN 2160-3006 (online)

Visit the ORTHODONTICS: The Art and Practice of Dentofacial Enhancement Facebook page

Publication:
Yearbook 2013
Volume 14 , Issue 1

Back
Share Abstract:

Nickel and chromium levels in the saliva of patients with fixed orthodontic appliances

Soghra Yassaei, DDS, MS/Shayesta Dadfarnia, PhD/Hakima Ahadian, DDS, MS/Farshad Moradi, DDS


DOI: 10.11607/ortho.810

Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate the salivary concentration
of nickel and chromium of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Methods: In this study 32 patients who presented to the orthodontic clinic were selected. The salivary samples were taken from the patients in four stages: before appliance placement and 20 days, 3 months, and 6 months following appliance placement. The salivary samples were collected in a plastic tube and were stored in the freezer before analysis. The samples were then transferred to the laboratory, and the amounts of metals were determined by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry with an autosampler. Each sample was analyzed three times, and the average was reported. Results: It was found that the average amount of nickel in the saliva 20 days after appliance placement
was 0.8 μg/L more than before placement. Also, the amount of salivary nickel
20 days after the appliance placement was more than at the other stages, but the differences were not significant. The average amount of chromium in the saliva was found to be between 2.6 and 3.6 μg/L. The amount of chromium at
all stages after appliance placement was more than before, but the differences between the chromium levels of saliva at all stages were not significant. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the average amount of salivary nickel and chromium of patients at various stages of orthodontic appliance placement. ORTHODONTICS (CHIC) 2013;14:e76e81. doi: 10.11607/ortho.810

Key words: chromium, nickel, salivary samples, corrosion

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files.
This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site
to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog