Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
World Journal of Orthodontics
WJO Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterYouTube
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: ORTHODONTICS
ORTHODONTICS
The Art and Practice of Dentofacial Enhancement

Formerly World Journal of Orthodontics

Edited by
Rafi Romano, DMD, MSc (Editor-in-Chief)

ISSN 2160-2999 (print) / ISSN 2160-3006 (online)

Visit the ORTHODONTICS: The Art and Practice of Dentofacial Enhancement Facebook page

Publication:
Yearbook 2012
Volume 13 , Issue 1

Back
Share Abstract:

Comparative radiographic evaluation of the alveolar bone support changes after incisal intrusion

Imad B. Kaied, DDS, PhD/Rina H. Tanielian, DDS, MS


Aim: To compare incisal axial inclination and alveolar bone changes after intrusion using segmented (Burstone) and utility (Ricketts) arches. Methods: The sample comprised 252 incisors in 39 patients (18 to 25 years of age). Eighteen patients were treated using utility arches, and 21 patients were treated using segmented arches. Lateral cephalograms were taken to evaluate incisal movements. CT scans with a slice thickness of 1 mm were exposed, and SSD-3D and MPR images were reconstructed. For all maxillary and mandibular incisors, changes of alveolar bone height; changes of labial and lingual alveolar bone thickness at apical level (A1 and A2), 3 mm coronal from the apex (A3 and A4), and 6 mm coronal from the apex (A5 and A6); and development of dehiscence and fenestration were evaluated after 5 months of intrusion. Results: Except for the retroclination of maxillary incisors in the Burstone group, all incisors experienced proclination. The greatest alveolar bone height loss was noted in the buccal alveolar bone height of the maxillary incisors in the Burstone group and the mandibular incisors in the Ricketts group (P < .05). There were decreases of alveolar bone thickness in both groups; however, the Ricketts group showed more bone decrease. These differences were significant for the maxilla (A1, A2, A4, and A6) and the mandible (A1 and A3) (P < .05). Conclusion: Using segmented arches (Burstone) under controlled biomechanical conditions minimizes the undesirable adverse effects of intrusion forces compared with utility arches (Ricketts). ORTHODONTICS (CHIC) 2012;13:6071.

Key words: alveolar bone, CT scan, incisor intrusion

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files.
This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site
to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog