Home Subscription Services
 
 
Loading
NEW
Sign Up to Receive Quintessence Updates by Email
 

 
World Journal of Orthodontics
WJO Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterYouTubeRSS
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: ORTHODONTICS
ORTHODONTICS
The Art and Practice of Dentofacial Enhancement

Formerly World Journal of Orthodontics

Edited by
Rafi Romano, DMD, MSc (Editor-in-Chief)

ISSN 2160-2999 (print) / ISSN 2160-3006 (online)

Visit the ORTHODONTICS: The Art and Practice of Dentofacial Enhancement Facebook page

Publication:
Winter 2011
Volume 12 , Issue 4

Back
Share Abstract:

In vitro evaluation of fluoride release of orthodontic bonding adhesives

Matheus Melo Pithon, DDS, MSc, PhD/Rogerio Lacerda dos Santos, DDS, MSc, PhD/Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas, DDS, MSc, PhD/Lincoln Issamu Nojima, DDS, MSc, PhD/Eduardo Franzotti Sant’anna, DDS, MSc, PhD

Pages: 290–295
PMID: 22299103

Aim: To assess the fluoride release from adhesives used for bonding in orthodontics. Methods: Six bonding agents were evaluated: five adhesives (Biofix, Fill Magic Orthodontic, EagleBond, Orthobond, and Transbond XT) and one resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement (Fuji Ortho LC), the latter serving as a control. Ten samples of each adhesive were stored in containers with 5 mL of deionized distilled water at 37°C. Fluoride release was measured with an ion-specific electrode. Readings were taken periodically for a total of 33 days. On day 28, all samples were immersed in a 0.221% sodium fluoride solution for 5 minutes to assess their recharge potential. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the fluoride release rates of each material. ANOVA with multiple comparisons and the Kruskal-Wallis tests (P < .05) were used to assess differences between the groups. Results: All adhesives released significant amounts of fluoride (P < .05). During the first day, Biofix released the highest amount of fluoride, followed by Fuji Ortho LC, which also showed the highest fluoride release from day 7 to day 33. The fluoride release from Biofix and Fuji Ortho LC decreased by the third day to 40% of its original value. All other adhesives maintained their fluoride release with only small fluctuations. Conclusion: All the materials released significant amounts of fluoride, with Biofix having the highest release in the first 3 days and Fuji Ortho LC over the total length of the experiment. ORTHODONTICS (CHIC) 2011;12:290–295.

Key words: adhesive, bonding agents, fluoride release, glass-ionomer cement, recharge

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files.
This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site
to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2013 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog