Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
Quintessence International
QI Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: QI
Quintessence International

Edited by Eli Eliav

ISSN 0033-6572 (print) • ISSN 1936-7163 (online)

Publication:
June 2011
Volume 42 , Issue 6

Back
Share Abstract:

Remineralization Of Bovine Enamel Subsurface Lesions: Effects Of Different Calcium-Phosphate Saturations In Buffered Aqueous Solutions

Peter Tschoppe, DDS, PhD/Andrej M. Kielbassa, DDS, PhD

Pages: 501514
PMID: 21519588

Objective: To evaluate the remineralizing effects of aqueous phosphate-buffered solutions using various saturations with respect to octacalcium phosphate or brushite (OCP/DCPD) on bovine enamel subsurface lesions. Method and Materials: Demineralized specimens (n = 18 per group) were exposed to one of six phosphate-buffered solutions with theoretical OCP saturations of S0.83, S1.17, S1.43, S1.64, S1.83, or S1.99 (pH, 6.3; calcium concentration, 0.53 to 3.18 mM). One aqueous solution without calcium was used as a negative control (S0; pH, 6.3); one without calcium and phosphate was a reference (S; pH, 4.3). HEPES-buffered Buskes solution served as a reference (B2.46; pH, 7.0); a pH-adjusted one was a positive control (B1.21; pH, 6.3). Mineral losses (whole lesion and surface area/inner part of the lesion) before and after storage (2 and 5 weeks, 37C) were evaluated from microradiographs. Results: The pH values of all solutions remained stable. Compared to baseline, S0.83 to S1.99 and B2.46 to B1.21 showed significantly increased mineral gains after both storage periods (P < .05, paired t test). S0 showed neutral effects (P = .190), whereas S demineralized the specimens (P < .001). Storage in S1.64, S1.83, and S1.99 revealed no differences compared to B2.46 (P > .997, ANOVA and Tukey), but a mineral gain of S1.64 to S1.99 was significantly increased compared to B1.21 (P < .012). Similar results could be observed for surface areas and inner lesion parts. Conclusion: The in vitro conditions chosen revealed that the used phosphate buffer system was suitable to maintain stable pH values. The higher saturated (OCP) solutions S1.64, S1.83, and S1.99 revealed mineral gains comparable to B2.46; thus, saturations of 1.64 (OCP) or 1 (DCPD) might be preferable for remineralization studies. (Quintessence Int 2011;42:501514)

Key words: calcium phosphates, enamel subsurface lesion, HEPES, microradiography, phosphate buffer, remineralization, saturation

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog