Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
Quintessence International
QI Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterYouTube
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: QI
Quintessence International

Edited by Eli Eliav

ISSN 0033-6572 (print) • ISSN 1936-7163 (online)

Publication:
June 2011
Volume 42 , Issue 6

Back
Share Abstract:

Effect Of Geometric Parameters On Finite Element Analysis Of Bone Loading Caused By Nonpassively Fitting Implant-Supported Dental Restorations

Werner Winter, Dr-Ing/Paul Steinmann, Prof Dr-Ing/Stefan Holst, PD Dr Med Dent/Matthias Karl, PD Dr Med Dent

Pages: 471478
PMID: 21519584

Objective: Finite element analysis (FEA) has been frequently used to study the loading situation of dental implants and bone resulting from the fixation of nonpassively fitting restorations. The goal of the present investigation was to demonstrate the effect of geometric model parameters and mesh size on FEA results. Method and Materials: Five three-dimensional FEA models representing a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) supported by two terminal implants were constructed. The models differed in terms of mesh size, bone geometry, implants, and restoration and were created either by joining virtual free-form objects or utilizing optical scans of existing components. By applying thermal changes in volume of specific elements in the area of the FDP pontic, a horizontal misfit of 10 m between implants and the restoration was introduced. The resulting loading situation of the bone around the implants was recorded as von Mises equivalent stress. Results: Maximum stress magnitudes ranging from 13.1 to 24.9 MPa occurred in the cortical part of the implant site where the neck of the implant penetrates bone. In trabecular bone, loading magnitudes were lower by a factor of 20. Modeling implant threads did have a remarkable effect on the stress situation as well as different span lengths of the restorations modeled. All other parameters led only to small variations in maximum loading magnitudes. Conclusion: Simplistic FEA models based on virtual free-form objects with limited level of mesh refinement seem to allow for a basic evaluation of peri-implant bone loading resulting from the fixation of misfitting superstructures. (Quintessence Int 2011;42:471478)

Key words: bone loading, finite element analysis, implant-supported restoration, model geometry, passive fit, von Mises equivalent stress

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog