Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
Quintessence International
QI Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: QI
Quintessence International

Edited by Eli Eliav

ISSN 0033-6572 (print) • ISSN 1936-7163 (online)

Publication:
September 2010
Volume 41 , Issue 8

Back
Share Abstract:

Prospective Study Of Zirconia-Based Restorations: 3-Year Clinical Results

Florian Beuer, Dr Med Dent, PhD/Michael Stimmelmayr, Dr Med Dent/ Wolfgang Gernet, Dr Med Dent, PhD, Dr hc/Daniel Edelhoff, Dr Med Dent, PhD/Jan-Frederic Güth, Dr Med Dent/ Michael Naumann, Dr Med Dent, PhD

Pages: 631–637
PMID: 20657851

Objectives: To evaluate fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and single crowns made of zirconia substructures veneered with new fluorapatite veneering porcelain. Method and Materials: Thirty-eight patients received 18 FDPs and 50 single crowns. Zirconia substructures were fabricated by a CAD/CAM system and veneered using the powder buildup technique. All restorations were cemented with glass ionomer. Baseline evaluation was performed 2 weeks after cementation with recall examinations at 12, 24, and 36 months by calibrated investigators. SEM was performed on replicas of all restorations. Survival probabilities according to Kaplan-Meier were calculated. Results: The mean service time was 35 (± 14) months. After 3 years of clinical service, three biologic and five technical failures were recorded. All failures occurred in the FDP group. One FDP was removed after biologic failure of one abutment tooth. The Kaplan-Meier survival probability was 88.2% after 35 months for all types of failures and 98.5% concerning restorations in service. The type of restoration showed significant influence on the survival probability (P < .001, log-rank test). No influence on gingival parameters from the restorations was observed compared to control teeth. Conclusions: Zirconia substructures veneered with fluorapatite veneering porcelain seem to be a reliable treatment option. More research has to be conducted to investigate differences between single crowns and FDPs. (Quintessence Int 2010;41:631–637)

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog