Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
Quintessence International
QI Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: QI
Quintessence International

Edited by Eli Eliav

ISSN 0033-6572 (print) • ISSN 1936-7163 (online)

Publication:
February 2010
Volume 41 , Issue 2

Back
Share Abstract:

Wear Of Denture Teeth And Their Human Enamel Antagonists

Muhamad Ghazal, DDS, DMD/Matthias Kern, DMD, PhD

Pages: 157–163
PMID: 20165747

Objectives: To evaluate the wear resistance of artificial denture teeth and their human enamel antagonists in a dual-axis chewing simulator. Method and Materials: Four artificial denture teeth—feldspathic ceramic, nanofilled composite resin, experimental acrylic resin with UDMA/PMMA, and interpenetrating polymer networks (IPN) acrylic resin teeth—were tested in this study. Human enamel cusps were used as antagonists. Wear resistance was analyzed by measuring the vertical substance loss and the volume loss of the denture teeth using a laser scanner after 300,000 chewing cycles. In addition, the vertical substance loss of the antagonists was evaluated using an optical macroscope. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA. For qualitative analysis of the wear areas, the teeth were sputter coated with gold and evaluated at magnifications of 503 and 1,0003 using SEM. Results: The composite resin teeth exhibited wear that was significantly higher than that of feldspathic ceramic but lower than that of acrylic resin teeth (P < .05). Acrylic resin teeth caused no measurable wear on the enamel antagonists. The wear patterns of the feldspathic ceramic and composite resin teeth can be described as attritional, while a fatigue type of wear was observed in the acrylic resin teeth. Conclusion: The lowest total vertical substance loss was found for the combination composite resin–enamel. Based on the results of this study, composite resin teeth seem to be more suitable for dentures opposing natural teeth than ceramic or acrylic resin teeth in terms of wear resistance. (Quintessence Int 2010;41:157–163)

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog