Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
Quintessence International
QI Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterYouTube
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: QI
Quintessence International

Edited by Eli Eliav

ISSN 0033-6572 (print) • ISSN 1936-7163 (online)

Publication:
March 2009
Volume 40 , Issue 3

Back
Share Abstract:

Influence of preparation angle on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia crown copings

Florian Beuer, Hans Aggstaller, Juliane Richter, Daniel Edelhoff, and Wolfgang Gernet

Pages: 243250
PMID: 19417888

Objective: To evaluate the effect of different preparation angles on the marginal and internal fit of zirconia single-crown copings. Method and Materials: Three ivorine maxillary right first molars were prepared with preparation angles of 4, 8, and 12 degrees. Impressions were made of each abutment tooth to obtain 20 specimens per group. The copings were manufactured by a CAD/CAM system and milled from semi-sintered zirconia blanks. After sintering, 10 copings were randomly chosen from each group and adapted by a dental technician. All 60 copings were cemented with glass ionomer on the master casts. After embedding, all specimens were cross-sectioned. Both marginal and internal fit were evaluated under an optical microscope. A 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a nonparametric test (Mann-Whitney U) were used to compare data (alpha = .05). Results: The 4-degree copings showed a mean marginal gap of 91 m ( 15) before and 67 m ( 8) after adaptation; the 8-degree group exhibited a mean marginal gap of 82 m ( 13) before and 67 m ( 11) after adaptation; the 12-degree specimens showed 50 m ( 6) before and 46 m ( 6) after adaptation. Adaptation led to a significant improvement of specimens from the 4-degree and 8-degree groups, while no statistical difference could be observed among 12-degree specimens before and after adaptation. Conclusion: The highest marginal gaps were found in the 4- and 8-degree groups. In the group with 12-degree preparation angle, additional adaptation did not improve the fit and can be considered unnecessary under the conditions of this study. (Quintessence Int 2009;40:243250)

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog