Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
Quintessence International
QI Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterYouTube
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: QI
Quintessence International

Edited by Eli Eliav

ISSN 0033-6572 (print) • ISSN 1936-7163 (online)

Publication:
October 2008
Volume 39 , Issue 9

Back
Share Abstract:

Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal recording materials

Muhamad Ghazal, DDS/Klaus Ludwig, Dr Rer Nat Habil/Matthias Kern, DMD, Dr Med Dent Habil

Pages: 727732
PMID: 19093044

Objective: To evaluate 4 interocclusal recording materials for their ability to reproduce accurately interocclusal relationships after a storage time of 1 or 48 hours. Method and Materials: A custom-made metal apparatus was used to simulate the maxilla and mandible. The vertical discrepancies were measured by a precision dial gauge. Eight inter-occlusal records were made in each of the following groups: (G1) Futar D (polyvinyl siloxane; Kettenbach), (G2) Ramitec (polyether; 3M ESPE), (G3) LuxaBite (composite resin based on bisacryl; DMG), (G4) Aluwax (aluminum wax; Aluwax Dental Products), (G5) LuxaBite corrected with LuxaBite, and (G6) LuxaBite corrected with Aluwax. The vertical discrepancies were measured after storage of the records for 1 and 48 hours at room temperature and repositioning of the records in the metal apparatus. Data were statistically analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance followed by the Games-Howell test (P ≤ .05). Results: After storage times of 1 and 48 hours, respectively, the mean vertical discrepancies (m) for G1 (23/33) and G2 (25/30) were statistically significantly lower than for G3 (431/745) and G4 (110/151) (P < .05) but higher than for G5 (8/16) and G6 (7/17). There was no statistically significant difference between G1 and G2 or between G5 and G6 for either measurement. Conclusion: These vertical discrepancies increased after a storage time of 48 hours. However, correction of the LuxaBite records with LuxaBite or Aluwax showed significantly lower vertical discrepancies than all other materials. Clinically, the vertical discrepancies the corrected records caused could be insignificant. (Quintessence Int 2008;39:727732)

Key words: aluminum wax, composite resin based on bisacryl, corrected record, dental material, interocclusal record, polyether, polyvinyl siloxane

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog