Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
Quintessence International
QI Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: QI
Quintessence International

Edited by Eli Eliav

ISSN 0033-6572 (print) • ISSN 1936-7163 (online)

Publication:
September 2008
Volume 39 , Issue 8

Back
Share Abstract:

Optical integration of incisoproximal restorations using the natural layering concept

Pascal Magne, DMD, PhD/Woong-Seup So, DDS, PhD

Pages: 633–643
PMID: 19107250

Objective: To evaluate the optical integration of 4 contemporary composite resin materials used for incisoproximal restorations and the natural layering concept. Method and Materials: Miris 2 (M2; Coltene Whaledent), Gradia Direct (GD; GC), Enamel Plus HFO (HFO; Micerium), and Filtek Supreme Plus (FSP; 3M ESPE) composite resins were used to consecutively restore 6 extracted incisors with incisoproximal restorations using the natural layering concept, mimicking the natural anatomy of the tooth with only 2 composite resin masses (dentin and enamel). Following each restoration, the specimen was allowed to rehydrate for 2 weeks and was then photographed under standardized conditions (direct, indirect, and fluorescent lights). Six independent evaluators scored each light condition using an optical integration score on a scale from 1 to 4 (1 = worst optical integration, restoration can be easily distinguished from remaining tissues; 4 = optimal optical integration, restoration “invisible”). Mean optical integration scores (from the 6 evaluators) were analyzed with a 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (composite resin brand and light condition). Pooled data of M2 and HFO (single-hue systems) and GD and FSP (multiple-hue systems) were also analyzed with a 2-way ANOVA (shade system and light condition). Results: M2 obtained the highest optical integration scores (P < .03), followed by GD and HFO (not significantly different, P = .99). FSP showed the least favorable optical behavior (P < .0001), which is explained in part by the lack of fluorescence and possible inappropriateness for use with the natural layering technique. Single-hue systems (M2 and HFO) achieved better optical integration (P < .02) compared to multihue systems (GD and FSP). Conclusions: For M2, the simplified natural layering concept produced incisoproximal restorations with excellent optical integration. GD and HFO are also suitable for this technique. FSP failed to produce acceptable optical integration in the present study. (Quintessence Int 2008;39:633–643)

Key words: composite resin, dental esthetics, natural layering technique, optical integration

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog