Home Subscription Services

Quintessence International
QI Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: QI
Quintessence International

Edited by Eli Eliav

ISSN 0033-6572 (print) • ISSN 1936-7163 (online)

May 2007
Volume 38 , Issue 5

Share Abstract:

Effects of 5 manipulative variables on the color of ceramics used for computer-generated restorations

Harry Denissen, DDS, PhD / Alma Dozic, DDS, PhD / Marinus van Waas, DDS, PhD / Albert Feilzer, DDS, PhD

Pages: 401408
PMID: 17568839

Objective: Monochromatic ceramic blocks used for computer-generated posterior restorations require color modification to achieve acceptable shade matches. However, it is not known whether manipulative variables affect the final color of these restorations. This study aimed to determine the effects of ceramic type, thickness, extrinsic colorants, glazing, and luting agent on the final color of monochromatic computer-generated ceramics. Method and Materials: One hundred forty-five ceramic specimens (12 mm 3 10 mm) with different thicknesses were machined from monochromatic ProCAD ceramics (shades 100, 200, and 300; Ivoclar Vivadent) and Vita ceramics (shades A3.5 and 3M2; Vita). The influence of thickness on color was determined on ProCAD and Vita specimens with thicknesses of 1.0, 1.2, 1.5, 2.0, and 10.0 mm, and the influence of extrinsic colorants, glazing, and luting agent was determined on ProCAD and Vita ceramics of 1.5-mm thickness. Panavia F TC (Kuraray) was used to create a luting-agent backing of 100-m thickness. CIELAB color coordinates (L*a*b*) were measured using a spectrophotometer, and color differences (DE) between the specimens were calculated. The criterion for color difference was considered to be 1.5 DE units. The data were statistically evaluated with ANOVA and the 2-tailed t test with a level of significance of 5%. Results: All 5 variables demonstrated significant differences for both ProCAD and Vita ceramics (P = .000). The DE values were larger than 1.5 units. Conclusion: Thickness and type of ceramic as well as extrinsic colorants, glazing, and a luting agent affect the color coordinates of monochromatic industrial ceramic. (Quintessence Int 2007;38:401408)

Key words: ceramics, color, computer-generated restorations, manipulative variables

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog