Home Subscription Services
 
   

 
Quintessence International
QI Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitter
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: QI
Quintessence International

Edited by Eli Eliav

ISSN 0033-6572 (print) • ISSN 1936-7163 (online)

Publication:
September 2013
Volume 44 , Issue 8

Back
Share Abstract:

The effects of two attachment types on the stresses introduced to the mandibular residual ridge: A 3D finite element analysis

Dashti, Mohammad Hossein / Atashrazm, Parsa / Emadi, Mehdi Imani / Mishaeel, Shiva / Banava, Sepideh

Pages: 585 - 590
PMID: 23757462
DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a29753

Purpose: Two commonly used attachment systems for implant-retained overdentures are bar and ball systems. The aim of this study was to compare these two types of attachments on the basis of the stresses introduced to the mandibular posterior residual ridge by an overdenture retained by two implants.
Method and Materials: A basic model was generated from the data provided by a CT scan of a patient’s mandible, the diagnostic casts, and the existing overdenture. Two root-form implants were placed in the anterior mandible. Models were used to simulate two situations: The first model represented an edentulous mandible supporting an overdenture retained by two implants connected with a bar and plastic clip system, and in the second model two ball attachments with nylon caps were used as the retention mechanism. A 35 N vertical load was introduced to the first molar region of each group to simulate the occlusal forces of the maxillary complete denture. The stresses in the mandibular residual ridges under the first molar region were measured using Ansys software.
Results: The bar-retained overdenture introduced higher stresses to the posterior mandibular residual ridge compared to the ball-retained overdenture (0.4 MPa and 0.1 MPa, respectively).
Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the ball system was shown to introduce a lower amount of stress to the posterior mandibular residual ridge compared to a bar and clip system.

Keywords: ball attachment, bar attachment, finite element analysis, mandibular implant-retained overdenture, posterior residual ridge

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog