Home Subscription Services

Quintessence International
QI Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: QI
Quintessence International

Edited by Eli Eliav

ISSN 0033-6572 (print) • ISSN 1936-7163 (online)

January 2013
Volume 44 , Issue 1

Share Abstract:

Marginal bone loss around unsplinted mini-implants supporting maxillary overdentures: A preliminary comparative study between partial and full palatal coverage

ELsyad, Moustafa Abdou / Ghoneem, Nahed Ebrahim / El-Sharkawy, Hesham

Pages: 45 - 52
PMID: 23444161
DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a28746

Objective: To evaluate and compare marginal bone loss around mini-implants supporting maxillary overdentures with either partial or full palatal coverage. Method and Materials: Nineteen edentulous patients complaining of retention problems involving their maxillary dentures were randomly allocated in two groups. Group I (n = 10) received maxillary dentures with full palatal coverage, and group II (n = 9) received maxillary dentures with partial palatal coverage. In total, 114 mini-implants (6 per patient) were inserted using the nonsubmerged flapless surgical approach and loaded immediately with maxillary overdentures. Each implant was evaluated at the time of initial prosthetic loading and at 6, 12, and 24 months thereafter. Radiographic evaluation was performed in terms of vertical and horizontal bone loss. Implant mobility (via Periotest values) was measured using a Periotest device, and patient satisfaction was evaluated with a visual analog scale. The cumulative survival rate was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: After 2 years, the mean vertical bone loss in groups I and II was 5.38 and 6.29 mm, respectively, while the mean horizontal bone loss in groups I and II was 1.52 and 1.93 mm, respectively. Most bone resorption occurred within 6 months after overdenture insertion in both groups. Group II recorded significant higher vertical bone loss and Periotest values than group I at all observation times. The cumulative survival rates of the mini-implants were 78.4% and 53.8% for groups I and II, respectively. All patients were satisfied with their maxillary overdentures in terms of retention and chewing ability. Conclusion: Rehabilitation of edentulous maxillae with unsplinted mini-implants supporting overdentures and in particular with a combination of partial palatal coverage is not recommended because of excessive marginal bone resorption and the higher failure rate of mini-implants than was expected. Keywords: bone loss, immediate load, maxillary, mini-implants, overdenture

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co Inc

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog