Home Subscription Services
 
 
Loading
NEW
Sign Up to Receive Quintessence Updates by Email
 

 
Quintessence International
QI Home Page
About the Editor
Editorial Board
Accepted Manuscripts
Submit
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Reprints / Articles
Permissions
Advertising
MEDLINE Search
 
 
 
 
 
FacebookTwitterYouTubeRSS
Quintessence Publishing: Journals: QI
Quintessence International

Edited by Eli Eliav

ISSN 0033-6572 (print) • ISSN 1936-7163 (online)

Publication:
October 2012
Volume 43 , Issue 9

Back
Share Abstract:

Circumferential fit assessment of CAD/CAM single crowns—A pilot investigation on a new virtual analytical protocol

Ragai E. Matta, DMD/Johannes Schmitt, DMD/Manfred Wichmann, DMD, PhD/Stefan Holst, DMD, PhD

Pages: 801-809
PMID: 23041996

Objective: Techniques currently applied to determine the marginal accuracy of dental crown restorations yield inadequate information. This investigation aimed to test a new virtual approach for determining the precision of fit of single-crown copings. Method and Materials: Zirconia single crown copings were manufactured on 10 gypsum, single-tooth master casts with two different established computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture (CAD/CAM) systems (groups A and B). After cementation, the circumferential fit was assessed with an industrial noncontact scanner and virtual 3D analysis, following a triple-scan protocol. Marginal fit was determined by virtual sectioning; each abutment-coping complex was digitally sliced in 360 vertical sections (1 degree per section). Standardized measurement distances for analyzing the marginal fit (z, xy, xyz) were selected, and a crosshair alignment was utilized to determine whether crowns were horizontally and/or vertically too large or small. The Mann-Whitney test was applied to test for differences between groups. Results: Significant differences in the xy direction (P = .008) were measured between groups. Group A showed a greater number of horizontally overextended margins and a higher frequency of xy distances greater than 150 μm, in addition to a tendency for excessive z distances (P = .095). Conclusion: The mean marginal gap values were clinically acceptable in the present investigation; however, a full circumferential analysis revealed significant differences in marginal coping quality. (Quintessence Int 2012;43:801–809)

Key words: CAD/CAM, fit, margin, virtual, zirconia

Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.
  © 2013 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc
 

Home | Subscription Services | Books | Journals | Multimedia | Events | Blog
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Help | Sitemap | Catalog