Follow Us      

LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 31 , Issue 6
November/December 2011

Pages 633-639


Fractal Analysis: A Novel Method to Assess Roughness Organization of Implant Surface Topography

Vittoria Perrotti, DDS, PhD/Guiseppe Aprile, DDS/Marco Degidi, MD, DDS/Adriano Piattelli, MD, DDS/Giovanna Iezzi, DDS, PhD


PMID: 22140665
DOI: 10.11607/prd.00.1023

Surface roughness is important for implant osseointegration. It has mostly been assessed by amplitude and height descriptors. Fractal analysis is derived from fractal geometry and is used to describe the organization of objects found in nature, quantifying their shape complexity with a value. Fractal dimension (Df ) is an index of the space-filling properties of an object and can be used as a parameter that describes the organization of surface roughness. The greater the Df value, the more chaotic the surface topography. The aim of this study was to assess the Df of implants with three different surface topographies to evaluate whether a novel method to measure roughness of implant surface topography could be developed. Forty-five disk-shaped samples (10 2 mm) with three different surface topographies were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy: group A, machined surface; group B, sandblasted and acid-etched surface; and group C, sandblasted, acid-etched, and neutralized surface. Images at 20,000 and 50,000 magnification were processed for quantitative analysis of Df using the box-counting method. Df values were correlated to the image magnification. At 20,000 magnification, Df for groups A, B, and C was 1.81, 1.67, and 1.59, respectively. At 50,000 magnification, Df was lower for all examined groups; more specifically, Df was 1.77, 1.59, and 1.42 for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between groups A and C at both magnifications. Df is used widely and successfully as a measurement to characterize anatomical structures and physiologic and pathologic processes. Df not only provides an index of roughness size values, but also a measure of roughness spatial organization; therefore, it could be a promising method to differentiate between rough surfaces capable of supporting osseointegration. (Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011;31:633639.)


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

PRD Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help