Follow Us      

Share Page:

Volume 30 , Issue 3
May/June 2010

Pages 237-243

Gingival Biotype Assessment in the Esthetic Zone: Visual Versus Direct Measurement

Joseph Y. K. Kan, DDS, MS/Taichiro Morimoto, DDS, MSD/Kitichai Rungcharassaeng, DDS, MS/Phillip Roe, DDS, MS/Dennis H. Smith, DDS, MSD

PMID: 20386780
DOI: 10.11607/prd.00.0918

This study evaluated the reliability of assessing visually the facial gingival biotype of maxillary anterior teeth with and without the use of a periodontal probe in comparison with direct measurements. Forty-eight patients (20 men, 28 women) with a single failing maxillary anterior tooth participated in this study. Three methods were used to evaluate the thickness of the gingival biotype of the failing tooth: visual, periodontal probing, and direct measurement. Prior to extraction, the gingival biotype was identified as either thick or thin via visual assessment and assessment with a periodontal probe. After tooth extraction, direct measurement of the gingival thickness was performed to the nearest 0.1 mm using a tension-free caliper. The gingival biotype was considered thin if the measurement was ≤ 1.0 mm and thick if it measured > 1.0 mm. The assessment methods were compared using the McNemar test at a significance level of a = .05. The mean gingival thickness obtained from direct measurements was 1.06 0.27 mm, with an equal distribution (50%) of sites with gingival thicknesses of ≤ 1 mm and > 1 mm. The McNemar test showed a statistically significant difference when comparing the visual assessment with assessment using a periodontal probe (P = .0117) and direct measurement (P = .0001). However, there was no statistically significant difference when comparing assessment with a periodontal probe and direct measurement (P = .146). Assessment with a periodontal probe is an adequately reliable and objective method in evaluating gingival biotype, whereas visual assessment of the gingival biotype by itself is not sufficiently reliable compared to direct measurement. (Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:237243.)

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.


© 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

PRD Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Author Guidelines
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us