LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 26 , Issue 4
July/August 2011

Pages 826836


Ex Vivo Mechanical Properties of Dental Implant Bone Cement Used to Rescue Initially Unstable Dental Implants: A Rabbit Study

Wook-Jin Seong, DDS, PhD/Hyeon-Cheol Kim, DDS, PhD/Soocheol Jeong, DDS, PhD/Dan L. DeVeau, BS/Conrado Aparicio, PhD/Yuping Li, PhD/James S. Hodges, PhD


PMID: 21841993

Purpose: Dental implant bone cement (DIBC) was developed to rescue unstable implants at the time of placement. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties of bone-cement-implant interfaces of cemented implants that were unstable initially and bone-implant interfaces of self-threaded implants placed in rabbit femurs after various healing periods. Interfaces and failure modes were also characterized using histology and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Materials and Methods: Eighty dental implants were placed in 20 rabbits. In each rabbit, two experimental and two control implants were placed in the right or left femur; one was in the distal epiphysis and the other in the cortical shaft. The experimental implants were cemented in loosely prepared bony sockets, while the control implants were self-threaded. The rabbits were sacrificed after varying healing periods. Magnetic pulse stability and push-in yield tests on ex vivo specimens measured secondary implant stability, 0.2% yield load, displacement, interface stiffness, and load at 100 m. After loading tests, interfaces were evaluated with histology and SEM. Most analyses used mixed linear models. Results: The 0.2% yield load, interface stiffness, load at 100 m, and secondary stability were significantly higher for bone-cement-implant interfaces than for bone-implant interfaces. Mechanical properties of bone-cement-implant interfaces plateaued at 1 week, with minimal change over the following 12 weeks, whereas bone-implant interfaces improved gradually. SEM and histology showed intimate bone-cement-implant interfaces without soft tissue intervention and mainly cohesive failures within DIBC. Secondary stability was significantly correlated with interface stiffness and load at 100 m. Conclusion: The results suggest that DIBC can provide early implant stability and mechanical properties superior to those of self-threaded implants while maintaining intimate interfaces without signs of osteonecrosis or soft tissue intervention. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:826836

Key words: dental implant bone cement, primary stability, rabbit femur, secondary stability, yield load


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help