LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 25 , Issue 5
September/October 2010

Pages 991–998


Influence of Artificial Aging on the Load-Bearing Capability of Straight or Angulated Zirconia Abutments in Implant/Tooth–Supported Fixed Partial Dentures

Frank P. Nothdurft, DDS, Dr Med Dent, Priv-Doz/Klaus E. Doppler, DDS/Kurt J. Erdelt, Dipl Ing, Dr Rer Biol Hum/Andreas W. Knauber, DT/Peter R. Pospiech, DDS, Dr Med Dent, Dr Med Dent Habil


PMID: 20862414

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of artificial aging on the fracture behavior of straight and angulated zirconia implant abutments used in ZirDesign (Astra Tech) implant/tooth–supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs) in the maxilla. Materials and Methods: Four different test groups (n = 8) representing anterior implant/tooth–supported FPDs were prepared. Groups 1 and 2 simulated a clinical situation with an ideal implant position (maxillary left central incisor) from a prosthetic point of view, which allowed for the use of a straight, prefabricated zirconia abutment. Groups 3 and 4 simulated a situation with a compromised implant position that required an angulated (20-degree) abutment. OsseoSpeed implants (4.5 3 13 mm, Astra Tech) as well as metal tooth analogs (maxillary right lateral incisor) with simulated periodontal mobility were mounted in polymethyl methacrylate. The FPDs (chromium-cobalt alloy) were cemented with glass ionomer. Groups 2 and 4 were thermomechanically loaded and subjected to static loading until failure. Statistical analysis of force data at the fracture site was performed using nonparametric tests. Results: All samples survived thermomechanical loading. Artificial aging did not lead to a significant decrease in load-bearing capacity in either the straight abutments or the angulated abutments. The restorations that used angulated abutments exhibited higher fracture loads than the restorations with straight abutments (group 1: 209.13 ± 39.11 N; group 2: 233.63 ± 30.68 N; group 3: 324.62 ± 108.07 N; group 4: 361.75 ± 73.82 N). This difference in load-bearing performance was statistically significant, both with and without artificial aging. All abutment fractures occurred below the implant shoulder. Conclusions: Compensation for angulated implant positions with an angulated zirconia abutment is possible without reducing the load-bearing capacity of implant/tooth-supported anterior FPDs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:991–998

Key words: fatigue testing, fracture resistance, implant abutments, load-bearing capability, zirconia, zirconium dioxide


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help