LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 18 , Issue 1
January/February 2003

Pages 7581


Sandblasted and Acid-etched Dental Implants: A Histologic Study in Rats

Vanessa C. Marinho, DDS, Renato Celletti, MD, DDS, Guido Bracchetti, DDS, Giovanna Petrone, DDS, Cedric Minkin, PhD, Adriano Piattelli, MD, DDS


PMID: 12608672

Purpose: Current literature has revealed that surface etching of endosseous implants can improve bone-implant contact. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in bone-implant contact (BIC) between sandblasted/acid-etched and machined-surface implants. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this study. Two implant surfaces, Ecotek (sandblasted/ acid-etched) and machined, were used with 1 implant placed in each tibia of the animals. A total of 64 implants were placed. BIC was evaluated at 5, 15, 30, and 60 days. Histomorphometry of the BIC was evaluated statistically. Results: The sandblasted/acid-etched surface demonstrated a greater BIC percentage than the machined surface. This difference was statistically significant only at 30 and 60 days after healing. Discussion and Conclusion: The sandblasted/acid-etched surface demonstrated a stronger bone response than the machined one at a later period of healing. (INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 2003;18:7581)


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help