Share Page:

Volume 25 , Issue 2
March/April 2010

Pages 394–400

Prospective Clinical Evaluation of 307 Single-Tooth Morse Taper–Connection Implants: A Multicenter Study

Carlo Mangano, MD, DDS/Francesco Mangano, DDS/Adriano Piattelli, MD, DDS/Giovanna Iezzi, DDS, PhD/Alberto Mangano, MD/Luca La Colla, MD

PMID: 20369101

Purpose: This prospective clinical study evaluated the incidence of abutment loosening of Morse taper–connection implants used for single-tooth replacement. In addition, the cumulative survival rate and the implant/crown success were evaluated. Materials and Methods: Implants were evaluated 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after insertion. The incidence of abutment loosening, modified Plaque Index, modified Sulcus Bleeding Index, probing depth, distance from the implant-crown margin to the coronal border of the peri-implant mucosa, width of keratinized mucosa, and the distance between implant shoulder and first bone-implant contact (DIB) were assessed. The cumulative survival rates were calculated with Kaplan-Meier estimates. Implant/crown success criteria included absence of abutment loosening, absence of suppuration and mobility, probing depth < 5.0 mm, and DIB < 1.5 mm after 12 months and not exceeding 0.2 mm for each following year. Results: Over a 4-year period (2003–2007; mean follow-up per implant: 30.79 months), 307 implants (162 maxillary, 145 mandibular) were inserted in 295 patients (125 men and 170 women aged between 24 and 79 years) at six different clinical centers. The sites included anterior (n = 115) and posterior (n = 192) teeth. At the end of the study, a very low percentage of implant-abutment loosening (0.66%) was found, with only two loosened abutments. The cumulative implant survival rate was 98.4%. Mean DIB was 1.14 mm (48 months). Only four surviving implants did not meet the criteria for success, and the implant/crown success rate was 97.07%. Conclusion: Based upon this study of 307 implants observed during a 4-year period, Morse taper–connection implants represent a good solution for single-tooth restorations, with a very low incidence of abutment loosening (0.66%). Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:394–400

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.


© 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Author Guidelines
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us