LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 17 , Issue 3
May/June 2002

Pages 384390


The Influence of Controlled Occlusal Overload on Peri-implant Tissue. Part 4: A Histologic Study in Monkeys

Takashi Miyata, DDS, DDS, Yukinao Kobayashi, DDS, Hisao Araki, DDS, DDS, Takaichi Ohto, DDS, Kitetsu Shin, DDS, DDS


PMID: 12074454

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to observe, after removing occlusal trauma and conducting plaque control, possible macroscopic and histologic changes in peri-implant tissue that had deteriorated resulting from experimental peri-implantitis, and to investigate the necessity for treatment procedures for peri-implantitis. Materials and Methods: Four monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) in good general health were used in this experiment. Three months after the second premolar and the first molar were extracted from the right mandible, 2 IMZ experimental implants were placed in each monkey. After a 3-month osseointegration period, a second surgery was conducted, followed by making an impression for fabrication of the prosthesis. Excessive occlusal height of the prosthesis was adjusted to 250m, and the experiment was continued for 8 weeks after placement of the prosthesis. Three models were created: (1) A superstructure with an excessive occlusal height was used for 8 weeks without any brushing (positive control, model P); (2) after the first 4 weeks with a prosthesis with excessive occlusal height and no brushing, the superstructure was removed and not used for the last 4 weeks while brushing was conducted (experimental model, model E); and (3) for 8 weeks, a prosthesis with an appropriate occlusal height was used with brushing (negative control, model N). Results: When these 3 models were compared with each other, macroscopic findings indicated inflammation only in model P. Mobility of implants was not seen in any model. Histopathologic observations revealed a slight difference between model E and model P in terms of the degree of inflammatory cell infiltration in the connective tissue. Discussion: No difference was found in the degree of bone resorption. Partial tearing was observed at the contact region between epithelial tissue and implant surfaces. Conclusions: (1) The contact between implants and epithelial or connective tissue is fragile; (2) inflammation and occlusion must be controlled more prudently than in the case of natural teeth; and (3) once periimplantitis has progressed, the control of occlusion and inflammation is probably not sufficient to promote the healing mechanism. (INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 2002;17:384390)


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help