Share Page:

Volume 17 , Issue 2
March/April 2002

Pages 161–174

Evaluation of a Tissue-Engineered Membrane-Cell Construct for Guided Bone Regeneration

Jan-Thorsten Schantz, MD, Dietmar Werner Hutmacher, M Eng, PhD, MBA, Kee Woei Ng, M Eng, Hwei Ling Khor, M Eng, Thiam Chye Lim, MD, Swee Hin Teoh, PhD

PMID: 11958398

Purpose: Currently, a number of bioresorbable and biodegradable membranes used for guided bone regeneration lead to incomplete tissue regeneration. Poor mechanical properties, short degradation time, and the lack of integrated biologic components result in the inability to create and maintain an appropriate environment and to actively support tissue remodeling. In the present study, the osteogenic potential of human calvarial periosteal cells in combination with ultrathin polycaprolactone (pc2) membranes of a slow biodegradation rate was investigated. Materials and Methods: In vitro and in vivo analyses of the tissue-engineered constructs were conducted using imaging techniques, immunohistochemistry, and histology. Two types of membranes were investigated. Group 1 consisted of a plain membrane, and in group 2 membranes were treated with sodium hydroxide. Results: In vitro results showed that osteoblast-like cells attached and proliferated on the membranes with the formation of extracellular matrix. Sodium hydroxide–treated membranes showed enhanced cell attachment and proliferation kinetics, resulting in a dense cellular layer after 2 weeks in culture. In vivo mineralized tissue formation in association with vascularization was observed. Extracellular matrix calcification with nodule formation was detected via histology as well as scanning electron microscopy. Discussion: PCL membranes support the attachment, growth, and osteogenic differentiation of human primary osteoblast-like cells. Sodium hydroxide–treated membranes demonstrated increased cell attachment resulting from increased hydrophilicity. Conclusion: These findings have potential application in the development of a new generation of osteoconductive membranes. (INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 2002;17:161–174)

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.


© 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Author Guidelines
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us