LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 24 , Issue 6
November/December 2009

Pages 10541060


Evaluation of the Osteogenic Potential in Experimental Defects, With and Without Bone Marrow, in the Rabbit Tibia: A Pilot Study

Alexander Veis, DDS, PhD/Konstantinos Kougias, BChD, MDSc/Anastasios Tsirlis, DDS, PhD/Nikolaos Parisis, DDS, PhD/Christina Papadopoulou, DDS/George E. Romanos, DDS, Dr Med Dent, PhD


PMID: 20162109

Purpose: The influence of bone marrow in the osteogenic potential of bone has not been evaluated in the rabbit tibia model. Previous studies employed this model extensively to test the osteogenic capabilities of bone grafts. The primary aim of the present study was to assess the role of bone marrow in the healing of experimental defects in the rabbit tibia model. Materials and Methods: Ten New Zealand rabbits were divided into two groups of five each. In the first experimental test group (PoP), the marrow cavity was emptied completely under a 6-mm defect in the rabbit tibia metaphysis; the marrow was replaced by plaster of Paris, and a round piece of lyophilized collagen membrane was placed in contact with the endosteum and rested on the plaster. In the second experimental group (control), similar artificial defects were made, but the marrow was left intact. After 8 weeks, the animals were sacrificed and prepared for histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Results: There was a statistically significant difference (P = .016) in newly formed bone area between the control group (mean, 68.08% 12.09%) and the PoP group (mean, 54.02% 13.93%). Similarly, there was a statistically significant difference in new bone density (P < .001) between the control group (mean, 95.99% 1.74%) and the PoP group (mean, 75.37% 13.27%). Conclusions: The current study confirms the significant effect that bone marrow has in bone regeneration and also the true regenerative capabilities of the osseous walls of the defects. The proposed experimental model may be a more reliable method of investigating and comparing the potential of different graft materials and methods. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:10541060


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help