LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 24 , Issue 5
September/October 2009

Pages 887–895


Immediate Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Preliminary Results of a Single-Cohort Prospective Study

Enrico L. Agliardi, MD, DDS/Luca Francetti, MD, DDS/Davide Romeo, DDS/Massimo Del Fabbro, BSc, PhD


PMID: 19865629

Purpose: This article reports preliminary results of a single-cohort prospective study that sought to evaluate a new surgical protocol for the immediate rehabilitation of edentulous maxilla without using bone grafting. Materials and Methods: Twenty consecutive patients in need of a full-arch maxillary rehabilitation were included in the study. Each patient received four tilted implants that engaged the posterior and the anterior sinus wall and two axial implants in the anterior maxilla. A total of 120 implants (30 Brånemark System MK IV and 90 NobelSpeedy Groovy) was inserted. Acrylic resin provisional prostheses were delivered within 4 hours of implant placement, and definitive restorations were placed 4 to 6 months later. Follow-up visits were scheduled every 6 months for the first 2 years and yearly thereafter. At each follow-up appointment, plaque and bleeding indexes were scored, periapical radiographs were obtained to assess marginal bone level changes, and patient satisfaction was recorded by means of a questionnaire. Results: The follow-up ranged between 18 and 42 months (average, 27.2 months). No implants failed. All prostheses were stable and functional. No adverse events occurred. At 1 year, mean marginal bone loss around axial and tilted implants was similar: 0.8 mm for axial implants (SD 0.4, n = 30) and 0.9 mm for tilted implants (SD 0.5 mm, n = 60) (P > .05). Plaque and bleeding scores decreased over time, and patient satisfaction with both esthetics and function increased. Conclusions: This technique can be considered a viable treatment modality for the immediate rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla, as it provides optimal support in the posterior region, minimizes distal cantilevers, and avoids bone grafting or sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:887–895


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help