Share Page:

Volume 24 , Issue 4
July/August 2009

Pages 679–683

Heat Transfer to the Implant-Bone Interface During Preparation of a Zirconia/Alumina Abutment

Jung-Bo Huh, DDS, MS/Steven E. Eckert, DDS, MS/Seok-Min Ko, DDS, MS, PhD/Yong-Geun Choi, DDS, MPH, MPH

PMID: 19885408

Purpose: Excessive heat at the implant-bone interface may compromise osseointegration. This study examined the heat generated at the implant surface during preparation of a zirconia/alumina abutment in vitro. Materials and Methods: Sixty zirconia/alumina abutments were randomized into 12 experimental groups. The abutments were connected to implants and embedded in an acrylic resin block in a 37°C water bath. The abutments were reduced by 1 mm in height over a period of 1 minute with a high-speed handpiece and then polished for 30 seconds with a low-speed handpiece, both with and without an air/water coolant. Temperatures were recorded via thermocouples at the cervical, middle, and apical part of the implant surfaces. The Mann-Whitney rank-sum test was used to assess the statistical significance of the difference in temperature between the abutment/implant complexes altered with and without coolant. Results: The 1-mm reduction with the high-speed handpiece without coolant resulted in a maximum temperature of 41.22°C at the cervical portion of the implant. Three of four temperatures above 40°C were observed at the cervical part of the implant following use of the high-speed handpiece without coolant. The temperature difference between “with coolant” and “without coolant” during both low-speed polishing and high-speed reduction was statistically significant at the cervical portion of the implant (P = .009). In contrast, the temperature difference between “with coolant” and “without coolant” during both low-speed polishing and high-speed reduction was not statistically significant at the middle and apical parts of the implant (P > .05). Conclusions: Preparation of a zirconia/alumina abutment caused an increase in temperature within the implant, but this temperature increase did not reach the critical levels described in the implant literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:679–683

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.


© 2015 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Author Guidelines
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us