LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 24 , Issue 4
July/August 2009

Pages 679–683


Heat Transfer to the Implant-Bone Interface During Preparation of a Zirconia/Alumina Abutment

Jung-Bo Huh, DDS, MS/Steven E. Eckert, DDS, MS/Seok-Min Ko, DDS, MS, PhD/Yong-Geun Choi, DDS, MPH, MPH


PMID: 19885408

Purpose: Excessive heat at the implant-bone interface may compromise osseointegration. This study examined the heat generated at the implant surface during preparation of a zirconia/alumina abutment in vitro. Materials and Methods: Sixty zirconia/alumina abutments were randomized into 12 experimental groups. The abutments were connected to implants and embedded in an acrylic resin block in a 37°C water bath. The abutments were reduced by 1 mm in height over a period of 1 minute with a high-speed handpiece and then polished for 30 seconds with a low-speed handpiece, both with and without an air/water coolant. Temperatures were recorded via thermocouples at the cervical, middle, and apical part of the implant surfaces. The Mann-Whitney rank-sum test was used to assess the statistical significance of the difference in temperature between the abutment/implant complexes altered with and without coolant. Results: The 1-mm reduction with the high-speed handpiece without coolant resulted in a maximum temperature of 41.22°C at the cervical portion of the implant. Three of four temperatures above 40°C were observed at the cervical part of the implant following use of the high-speed handpiece without coolant. The temperature difference between “with coolant” and “without coolant” during both low-speed polishing and high-speed reduction was statistically significant at the cervical portion of the implant (P = .009). In contrast, the temperature difference between “with coolant” and “without coolant” during both low-speed polishing and high-speed reduction was not statistically significant at the middle and apical parts of the implant (P > .05). Conclusions: Preparation of a zirconia/alumina abutment caused an increase in temperature within the implant, but this temperature increase did not reach the critical levels described in the implant literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:679–683


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help