Share Page:

Volume 24 , Issue 4
July/August 2009

Pages 655662

Healing Response of Cortical and Cancellous Bone Around Titanium Implants

Ji-Eun Lee, DDS, MSD/Seong-Joo Heo, DDS, MSD, PhD/Jai-Young Koak, DDS, MSD, PhD/Seong-Kyun Kim, DDS, MSD, PhD/Chong-Hyun Han, DDS, MSD, PhD/Shin-Jae Lee, DDS, MSD, PhD

PMID: 19885405

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in the healing of cortical and cancellous bone around titanium implants with two different surfaces (machined or anodized) in rabbit tibiae. Materials and Methods: Screw-shaped commercially pure titanium implants of two different surface types were fabricated: machined implants (control) and anodized implants; each had two transverse canals that served as sites for bone ingrowth. In the tibiae of six New Zealand white rabbits, a total of 24 implants (12 implants of each surface) were surgically placed in a randomized arrangement. The upper transverse canal was positioned in the cortical bone region, and the lower transverse canal was positioned in the cancellous bone region. After a 1-month healing period, undecalcified ground sections were subjected to histologic and histomorphometric analyses. A mixed-model analysis of variance was used to compare the two types of implants and to control for the random effect of animals. Results: The percentage of bone-to-implant contact (BIC) inside the upper canals was 16.45% 4.05% for controls (machined surface) and 24.85% 4.86% for anodized implants. BIC inside the lower canals was 7.01% 2.34% for controls and 11.35% 2.67% for anodized implants. The percentage of bone area inside the upper canals was 10.94% 4.06% for controls and 27.95% 12.38% for anodized implants. The percentage of bone area inside the lower canals was 3.16% 1.08% for controls and 4.66% 1.53% for anodized implants. For all measures, the anodized implants had higher values than the controls (P < .0001). Conclusion: The results suggest that anodized surface modification of titanium implants is beneficial to both cortical and cancellous bone healing. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:655662

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.


© 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Author Guidelines
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us