LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 9 , Issue 6
November/December 1994

Pages 711-718


Free-Standing vs Tooth-Connected Implant Supported Fixed Partial Restorations: A Comparative Retrospective Clinical Study of the Prosthetic Results

Fabrizio Cavicchia, DDS/Fabrizio Bravi, DDS

The opportunity to connect implants and teeth has been discussed in the literature. A comparative retrospective study was performed to evaluate the prosthetic results obtained in our clinical experience with 31 free-standing and 30 tooth-connected posterior IMZ implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Complications such as the loosening and fracture of fixation screws and abutments, ceramic fractures, and natural tooth migration were observed. A significant difference in the incidence and types of such complications in the two groups was found: problems occurred more frequently and in a different pattern with the free-standing compared to tooth connected restorations. Possible explanations for this dissimilar behavior are discussed. (INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 1994;9:711-718)

Key words: complications, free-standing, implant-supported fixed partial dentures, intramobile elements, proprioception, tooth-connected


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help