LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 9 , Issue 3
May/June 1994

Pages 361-366


Universal Abutments for Implant Prosthodontics: A Case Report

Richard P. Kinsel, DDS

Each available cylindrical endosseous dental implant requires unique prosthodontic components to restore osseointegrated implants. The prosthodontist may not always have the opportunity to dictate the implant system for every patient, since this decision too frequently is made by the surgeon without prior consultation with the restoring dentist. Therefore, a large inventory of prosthetic components for each manufacturer’s system is required. To address this problem, third-party manufacturers developed the concept of the universal abutment. The purported advantages of prosthetic-component standardization, regardless of the type of implant, are appealing. A case report involving a patient requiring prosthetic rehabilitation of posterior edentulous quadrants using IMZ implants is presented. The Universal Modification Abutment replaced the intramobile element and transmucosal extension. The advantages include a one-piece titanium-alloy tissue extension, more variety of transmucosal lengths, and compatibility of the prosthetic components regardless of implant. (INT ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 1994;9:361-366)

Key words: compatibility, implants, prosthodontics, universal abutment


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help