Share Page:

Volume 4 , Issue 2
Summer 1989

Pages 95-105

A Comparative Study of Results with Various Endosseous Implant Systems

B. d’Hoedt, Dr/W. Schulte, Prof Dr

PMID: 2599587

The results of regular follow-up of various endosseous titanium implant systems are presented together with an overview of the results with Tübingen Frialit® aluminum oxide ceramic implants. Using ITI implants, pathological findings for sulcus depth and peri-implant bone degradation were found significantly more frequently than with the other titanium implants. Clinical mobility was present significantly more frequently with TPS implants than with the IMZ system, whereas an increase in the depth of the peri-implant sulcus alone occurred significantly more frequently with the IMZ and ITI than with the TPS implant system. The observation period for Brånemark implants is too short to permit final evaluation. However, pathological findings have not occurred to date. (INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 1989;4:95-105.)

Key words: Brånemark implant, endosseous implant, IMZ implant, ITI implant, recall, titanium, TPS implant, Tübingen Frialit implant

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.


© 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Author Guidelines
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us