Share Page:

Volume 23 , Issue 4
July/August 2008

Pages 733743

Clinical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction Following Full-Flap Elevation for Early and Delayed Placement of Single-Tooth Implants: A 5-year Randomized Study

Lars Schropp, DDS, PhD/Flemming Isidor, DDS, PhD, Dr Odont

PMID: 18807572

Purpose: This 5-year follow-up report presents the outcome of early and delayed placement of single-tooth implants. Materials and Methods: An implant was placed on average 10 days after tooth extraction in 23 patients (early) and 3 months after tooth extraction in 22 patients (delayed). All implants were placed in the anterior or premolar regions of the maxilla or mandible. Survival rates, prosthodontic complications, probing pocket depths (PPDs), marginal bone levels measured on radiographs (MBLs), soft tissue appearance (papilla dimensions and clinical crown height), and patient satisfaction were evaluated during an observation period of 5 years. Several patients with prior generalized gingival recession were included in the study, and modification of the papilla scoring was made in these cases. Results: Two implants in the early group and 1 in the delayed group failed before occlusal loading. No further implants were lost during the follow-up period. The mean PPD varied from 3.3 to 4.5 mm in the early group and from 3.6 to 4.4 mm in the delayed group 5 years after implant placement. During the 5-year period, an annual marginal bone loss of less than 0.2 mm was found in both groups. Although the early group performed slightly better than the delayed group as to soft tissue appearance just after seating of the implant restoration, the papilla dimensions and the clinical crown height improved spontaneously over time, and no significant differences between the 2 protocols were seen after 5 years. Furthermore, patients in both groups were highly satisfied with the outcome of their implant treatment. Conclusion: The outcomes of early and delayed placement of single-tooth implants were comparable in terms of high survival rates, few prosthetic complications, acceptable MBLs and PPDs, as well as soft tissue appearance and patient satisfaction during a 5-year follow-up period. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:733743

Key words: delayed implant placement, early implant placement, patient satisfaction, prosthetic complications, soft tissue appearance

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.


© 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Author Guidelines
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us