Share Page:

Volume 23 , Issue 3
May/June 2008

Pages 474480

Replacement of Mandibular Molars with Single-Unit Restorations Supported by Wide-Body Implants: Immediate Versus Delayed Loading. A Randomized Controlled Study

Gian Pietro Schincaglia, DDS, PhD/Riccardo Marzola, DDS/Giovanni Fazi Giovanni, DDS, MSc/Chiara Scapoli Chiara PhD/Roberto Scotti, MD, DDS

PMID: 18700371

Purpose: This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to compare single implant-supported mandibular molar restorations using either an immediate or a delayed loading protocol. Materials and Methods: Thirty subjects requiring single mandibular molar replacement were consecutively treated. One implant was placed in each patient. Fifteen subjects were assigned to delayed loading protocol and 15 to immediate loading protocol according to a randomization table. After insertion, the delayed loaded implants were connected to a healing abutment and restored after 3 to 4 months of healing without loading. The immediately loaded implants were loaded within 24 hours of surgery with a provisional restoration. The interim prosthesis was placed in centric occlusion. All contacts in lateral excursions were eliminated. At implant placement the maximum value of insertion torque was recorded. Radiographic bone level change was measured on periapical radiographs obtained at the time of implant placement and 12 months after loading. Means of the 2 groups were compared by Student t test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The level of significance was set at .05. Results: No implants were lost in the delayed loading group (0/15), whereas 1 implant failed (1/15) in the immediate loading group. No differences were observed in relation to implant length or insertion torque between the groups. The average radiographic bone level change after 1 year of function was 1.2 0.55 mm (range, 0.5 to 2.6 mm) and 0.77 0.38 mm (range, 0.29 to 1.23 mm) for the delayed loaded and the immediately loaded implants, respectively. The difference in radiographic bone level change between the delayed and immediate loading groups was statistically significant (P = .022; CI = 0.79 to 0.06; Student t test). Conclusions: Immediate loading of wide-diameter implants supporting single restorations in mandibular molar sites seems to be a suitable clinical option. Moreover, the radiographic bone level change observed after 12 months of loading was significantly less for immediately loaded implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:474480

Key words: dental implants, immediate loading, randomized controlled trial

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.


© 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Author Guidelines
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us