LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 22 , Issue 3
May/June 2007

Pages 390398


Is There Evidence that Barrier Membranes Prevent Bone Resorption in Autologous Bone Grafts During the Healing Period? A Systematic Review

Pepijn F. M. Gielkens, MD / Ruud R. M. Bos, DMD, PhD / Gerry M. Raghoebar, MD, DMD, PhD / Boudewijn Stegenga, DMD, PhD


PMID: 17622005

Introduction: Autologous bone is considered the reference standard for bone-grafting procedures. A barrier membrane covering an autologous bone graft (guided bone regeneration [GBR]) is expected to prevent graft resorption. Good clinical results have been reported for GBR, although potential complications and relatively high costs have been implicated as disadvantages. However, most studies on the subject have been uncontrolled. Purpose: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available evidence that barrier membranes prevent bone resorption in autologous onlay bone grafts. The primary outcome measure was bone resorption. Results: The search yielded 182 articles. Two observers independently appraised 32 relevant studies methodologically, yielding 14 controlled studies. The articles included human and animal experiments with heterogenous objectives and outcome variables. Although most authors concluded that they had found evidence for the protective effect of barrier membrane on bone resorption in bone grafts, this systematic review reveals that the available evidence is too weak to support this. Most included studies were animal experiments; thus, extrapolation to the human situation is difficult. Most studies also had a small number of test sites, and sample size justification was generally not reported. Furthermore, ambiguity and lack of significance were found in many studies, along with additional limitations such as implantation site, nonsuitable designs, and varying outcome measures. Conclusion: Based on a systematic review of the literature, further evidence is needed to determine whether barrier membranes prevent bone resorption in autologous onlay bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:390398

Key words: artificial membranes, bone grafts, bone


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help