LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 22 , Issue 2
March/April 2007

Pages 226–234


Clinical Evaluation of a Prospective Multicenter Study on 1-piece Implants. Part 1: Marginal Bone Level Evaluation After 1 Year of Follow-up

Kaj Finne, DDS / Eric Rompen, DDS, PhD / Joseph Toljanic, DDS


PMID: 17465347

Purpose: The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the marginal bone level after 1 year of follow-up of 1-piece implants after immediate provisional restoration fabrication. Materials and Methods: Patients received NobelDirect and NobelPerfect 1-piece implants (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) that were immediately restored and placed into function as part of a 3-year, multicenter investigation. Life table analysis was used for evaluation of implant cumulative survival rates. The Student t test (for dichotomous variables) and Pearson correlation (for continuous and ordered categorical variables) were used to estimate the influence of separate parameters on marginal bone. Results: Eighty-seven patients received 152 NobelDirect or NobelPerfect 1-piece implants. Of these, 81 patients returned for the 1-year follow-up and 21 for the 2-year follow-up. Three implants were lost, resulting in a cumulative survival rate of 97.9% after up to 2 years. The average marginal bone level at implant placement was 0.33 mm (SD 1.20, n = 141) superior to the reference point (lower edge of the implant collar). Marginal bone level was –0.77 mm (SD 1.33, n = 138) at 6 months and –0.98 mm (SD 1.38, n = 123) at 1 year. Average bone level at the 2-year follow-up was 0.17 mm (SD 1.20, n = 26). After 1 year of loading, bone level in the maxilla was more apical compared to that in the mandible (P = .05), and a positive correlation was found between bone level at placement and bone level at 12 months (P = .008). Shallow implant positioning resulted in less marginal bone remodeling compared to deep implant positioning. Conclusion: On the basis of this prospective multicenter study, stable marginal bone level and soft tissue support the hypothesis that the 1-piece implant has the capacity to preserve both hard and soft tissue. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:226–234

Key words: bone level, immediate function, 1-piece dental implants, radiologic evaluation


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help