LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 21 , Issue 3
May/June 2006

Pages 354365


Effects of Surface Topography on the Connective Tissue Attachment to Subcutaneous Implants

Hugh Kim, DMD, MSc / Hiroshi Murakami, DDS, PhD / Babak Chehroudi, DMD, PhD / Marcus Textor, PhD / Donald M. Brunette, PhD


PMID: 16796277

Purpose: A major concern for implants that penetrate stratified epithelia is aggressive epithelial proliferation and migration. This epithelial downgrowth on the implant can be inhibited by a firm attachment between the underlying connective tissue and the implant. This study evaluates the connective tissue attachment to titanium implants with various well-defined surface topographies. Materials and Methods: Titanium-coated epoxy replicas of polished (PO; Ra = 0.06 m), finely blasted (FB; Ra = 1.36 m), coarsely blasted (CB; Ra = 5.09 m), acid-etched (AE; Ra = 0.59 m), coarsely blasted and acid-etched (SLA; Ra = 4.39 m), titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS; Ra = 5.85 m), machined-like (ML; Ra=2.15 m), and micromachined grooved (GR; V-shaped grooves 30 m deep) surfaces were implanted subcutaneously in 74 rats for 1 to 11 weeks. Animals were sacrificed weekly. Surfaces were processed for histomorphometric evaluation of connective tissue attachment, capsule thickness, and where applicable, the degree of separation between the tissue and implant. Results: A total of 153 test surfaces were analyzed. Statistical analysis revealed that textured and rough substrata, namely the GR, TPS, AE, CB, and SLA surfaces, exhibited significantly greater (P < .05) connective tissue attachment and thinner fibrous encapsulation when compared to the PO surface. Tissue separation from the implant interface was of significantly lower magnitude and frequency with the rough surfaces than with the PO surface. Conclusions: The results indicate that rough implant surfaces are associated with stable connective tissue attachment, which has implications for their use in percutaneous and permucosal applications. In addition, data from the AE surface may indicate that the geometry of the surface irregularities can also be a significant determinant of the connective tissue response. (Basic Science) (More than 50 references) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:354365

Key words: connective tissue attachment, fibrous capsule, surface topography, tissue-implant interface


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help