LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 35 , Issue 6
November/December 2020

Pages 11771186


Zygomatic Implants for the Rehabilitation of Atrophic Maxillae: A Retrospective Study on Survival Rate and Biologic Complications of 206 Implants with a Minimum Follow-up of 1 Year

Perla Della Nave, DDS/Alberto Vericat Queralt, MS


DOI: 10.11607/jomi.8448

Purpose: To carry out a retrospective analysis of the placement of zygomatic implants in atrophic maxillae and to assess the outcomes in terms of survival rate and biologic complication incidence, with a follow-up of at least 1 year and in 13% of cases, longer than 5 years. Materials and Methods: The study included all patients rehabilitated through zygomatic implant surgery from 2006 to 2017 and excluded those treated in 2018 to guarantee a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Depending on the specific case, one, two, or three zygomatic implants were placed in combination with conventional implants, or four zygomatic implants were placed alone (zygoma quad). All implants were placed by the same surgeon in a private clinic through an anatomy-guided surgical approach and were immediately loaded with screwed provisional prostheses up to the end of the osseointegration phase. Patients who did not undergo any or the last follow-up visits were not included in order to assess the real conditions of implants, soft tissues, and maxillary sinuses in the last year of follow-up (2018). Results: A total of 206 zygomatic implants were placed in 102 patients. There were only two failures due to a lack of osseointegration (0.97%): in one case, 3 months after placement and in the other one, 2 years after placement. There were five cases of sinusitis (2.42%), two of which also presented oroantral communication (0.97%); in three cases, antibiotic and conservative treatments alone were not effective, so the removal of the zygomatic implant was necessary. Finally, two cases of mucosal recession (0.97%) appeared in two anterior zygomatic implants. The global survival rate was 97.57%, and all biologic complications are currently stable. Conclusion: In this study, the rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae through zygomatic implants was shown to be a predictable treatment, which allows a graftless approach and makes it possible to carry out immediate loading protocols, with enormous psychologic advantages for patients. Survival rates are high, and complication incidence is low. Thus, at present, zygomatic implants may be considered a reliable treatment option in the case of severe atrophic maxillae.


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2020 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help