LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 19 , Issue 4
July/August 2004

Pages 549553


Soft Tissue Healing Around Implants Placed Immediately After Tooth Extraction Without Incision: A Clinical Report

Ugo Covani, MD, DDS/Antonio Barone, DDS, PhD/Roberto Cornelini, MD3/Roberto Crespi, MD


PMID: 15346752

Purpose: The purposes of the present study were to evaluate implants placed immediately after tooth extraction without incision or primary flap closure and to observe the peri-implant soft tissue healing. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients (9 men and 6 women) aged 31 to 54 years were included in this study. Each patient had a tooth that required extraction, and each had at least 4 mm of bone beyond the root apex. Teeth with multiple roots were excluded from this study. After tooth extraction, the implants were immediately placed without incision or flap elevation. Implant sites showing bone fenestrations, bone dehiscences, or peri-implant bone defects exceeding 2 mm were excluded from this study. In these cases, a standard guided bone regeneration procedure with a surgical flap elevation was used. The second-stage surgical procedure was performed 6 months after the first procedure. The following clinical parameters were evaluated at the time of implant placement and at secondstage surgery: levels of mesial and distal papillae, width of keratinized mucosa, position of mucogingival junction relating to the surrounding tissues, and peri-implant radiolucency and marginal bone loss, which were evaluated radiographically. Results: The postsurgical healing period was uneventful for all patients. Soft tissue closure over the implant sites was achieved in 1 to 3 weeks after surgery at all sites. At second-stage surgery, no peri-implant bone defects were observed or detected by probing around all the experimental implants. The soft tissue anatomy was considered clinically acceptable in all patients. Discussion and Conclusion: Successful osseointegration and complete bone healing were observed for all patients. The soft tissue healing and morphology were satisfactory; additional mucogingival surgery was not required before definitive prosthetic rehabilitation. INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 2004;19:549553


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help