LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 28 , Issue 6
November/December 2013

Pages 1553–1563


Placement of Implants with Platform-Switched Morse Taper Connections with the Implant-Abutment Interface at Different Levels in Relation to the Alveolar Crest: A Short-Term (1-Year) Randomized Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial

Theofilos Koutouzis, DDS, MS/Rodrigo Neiva, DDS, MS/Jörg Nonhoff, DDS, PhD/Tord Lundgren, DDS, PhD


PMID: 24278924
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3184

Purpose: This study sought to prospectively evaluate changes in marginal bone levels and soft tissue dimensions around platform-switched, Morse taper–connection implants placed with the implant-abutment interface (IAI) at different positions in relation to the alveolar crest. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients in need of single-tooth rehabilitations were randomly assigned to three groups based on the position of the IAI in relation to the alveolar crest at the time of implant placement. Implants in groups 0, 1, and 2 (n = 10 in each group) were placed at the bone level or 1 mm and 2 mm below the buccal aspect of the alveolar crest, respectively. Four months later, the implants were restored with crowns. Clinical parameters were recorded at 4 and 12 months, and marginal bone levels were assessed radiographically at placement, 4 months, and 12 months. Results: Mean marginal bone loss below the implant platform in group 0 implants was 0.18 ± 0.27 mm at 4 months and 0.27 ± 0.45 mm at 12 months. All implants in groups 1 and 2 exhibited no marginal bone loss below the implant platform, since the first bone-to-implant contact was located at or above the implant margin. At 12 months, implants in groups 1 and 2 exhibited greater mean bone loss above the implant platform compared to implants in group 0, but the differences were not statistically significant (group 0, 0.64 ± 0.49 mm; group 1, 0.81 ± 0.31 mm; group 2, 1.20 ± 0.68 mm). Implants in groups 1 and 2 exhibited a statistically significantly higher percentage of implant surfaces with bone on the implant platform compared to group 0 implants (90% versus 35%). Conclusions: In the present study, differences in peri-implant bone responses existed for implants placed with the IAI at different locations in relation to the alveolar crest.


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2017 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help