LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 28 , Issue 5
September/October 2013

Pages 1347ľ1351


Clinical Accuracy of Flapless Computer-Guided Surgery for Implant Placement in Edentulous Arches

Dalton Marinho Vieira, DDS, MS, PhD/Bruno Salles Sotto-Maior, DDS, MS, PhD/Carlos Alberto Villaša de Souza Barros, DDS, MS/Elson Sim§es Reis, DDS, MS, PhD/Carlos Eduardo Francischone, DDS, MS, PhD


PMID: 24066327
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3156

Purpose: Although flapless computer-guided implant placement provides important benefits, deviations from the planned implant placement in the edentulous arch may pose significant risks. This study evaluated the reliability and accuracy of a flapless computer-guided surgical approach. Materials and Methods: Computer-generated preoperative implant planning was compared to actual placement by cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scanning of patients before and after surgery. A well-fitting complete denture or optimized prosthetic tooth arrangement was used and converted to a radiographic template. Prior to scanning, esthetics and functional aspects were checked clinically. The implant positions were virtually determined by the implant planning software relative to the bone structure and prospective tooth position. After implant placement, new CBCT scans were obtained for each subject. Software was used to fuse the images of the planned and placed implants, and the locations and axes were compared. The normality of the data distribution was evaluated by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Mean values were compared between groups based on the upper or lower jaws with the t test for independent samples. The level of significance was fixed at 5%. Results: Sixty-two implants were placed in edentulous arches with stereolithographic surgical guides in 14 patients. Damage due to implant placement was not observed in any critical anatomical structure. Compared to the planned implants, placed implants showed mean and standard deviation linear measurements at the cervical, middle, and apical implant portions of 2.17 (▒ 0.87), 2.32 (▒ 1.52), and 2.86 (▒ 2.17) mm, for the maxilla, and 1.42 (▒ 0.76), 1.42 (▒ 0.76), and 1.42 (▒ 0.76) mm, for the mandible, respectively. The angular deviations were 1.93 (▒ 0.17) and 1.85 (▒ 0.75) degrees for the maxilla and mandible, respectively. The linear deviation differed significantlybetween the upper and lower jaws, but the angular deviation did not. Conclusion: Flapless computer-guided surgery may be a viable treatment option for rehabilitating the edentulous arch.


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help