LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 28 , Issue 3
May/June 2013

Pages 790–797


Effects of a Calcium Phosphate–Coated and Anodized Titanium Surface on Early Bone Response

Jung-Woo Koh, DDS, MSD, PhD/Young-Sung Kim, DDS, MSD, PhD/Jae-Ho Yang, DDS, MSD, PhD/In-Sung Yeo, DDS, MSD, PhD


PMID: 23748310
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2783

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a calcium phosphate (CaPO4)–coated and anodized titanium surface in vitro and in vivo. Materials and Methods: A turned surface was employed as a negative control. A sandblasted/acid-etched surface and an anodized surface were used as positive controls, and a CaPO4-coated and anodized (CPA) surface was investigated as the experimental group. Surface characteristics were analyzed with field emission scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy, and confocal laser scanning microscopy. In vitro osteoblastic differentiation was evaluated by alkaline phosphatase assay. In vivo bone response was analyzed using bone-to-implant contact (BIC) ratios and bone area (BA) of 2- and 4-week specimens obtained from six rabbits. Results: The means and standard deviations for average height deviation (Sa) and developed surface area ratio (Sdr) were 0.32 ± 0.03 μm and 3.6% ± 1.5% for the turned group, 1.36 ± 0.11 μm and 56.7% ± 16.1% for the sandblasted/acid-etched group, 0.68 ± 0.02 μm and 50.9% ± 2.9% for the anodized group, and 0.67 ± 0.11 μm and 50.0% ± 16.9% for the CPA group. There were no significant differences in alkaline phosphatase activity among the groups at 7 and 14 days. In the in vivo experiment, the CPA group exhibited a significantly higher BIC ratio than the turned group, and the anodized and CPA groups showed significantly higher BA values than the others after 2 weeks. At 4 weeks, there was no significance in either BIC ratios or BA values among the groups. Conclusion: A CaPO4 coating on an anodized surface may induce rapid osseointegration at the bone-implant interface and more bone formation near the implant surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:790–797. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2783


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help