Share Page:

Volume 28 , Issue 2
March/April 2013

Pages 587596

Characteristics and Dimensions of the Sinus Membrane in Patients Referred for Single-Implant Treatment in the Posterior Maxilla: A Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis

Adrienne C. Schneider, Dr Med Dent/Urs Bragger, Prof Dr Med Dent/Pedram Sendi, PD Dr Med, Dr Med Dent/Marco D. Caversaccio, Prof Dr Med/Daniel Buser, Prof Dr Med Dent/Michael M. Bornstein, PD Dr Med Dent

PMID: 23527364
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3007

Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the thickness and anatomic characteristics of the sinus membrane using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in patients evaluated for implant surgery in the posterior maxilla. Materials and Methods: The study included 131 consecutive patients referred for dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla. A total of 138 CBCT images was obtained using fields of view of 4 4 cm, 6 6 cm, or 8 8 cm. Reformatted sagittal CBCT slices were analyzed with regard to the thickness and characteristics of the sinus membrane at single-tooth gaps in the posterior maxilla. Factors that might influence the dimensions of the sinus membrane, such as age, sex, endodontic status, and the season, were analyzed. Results: The mean thickness of the maxillary sinus mucosa varied between 2.1 and 2.69 mm in the three locations analyzed. Fewer than half of the evaluated sinuses exhibited a healthy mucosa (49 of 138, or 35.51%). Most of the pathologic findings were flat, shallow thickenings (63 of 138, or 45.65%). Sex did not influence the thickness of the sinus membrane at the root tips of the premolars or at single-tooth gaps, but there was a statistically significant correlation in the region of the maxillary molars. No other evaluated factors had a statistically significant effect on the dimensions of the antral mucosa. Conclusions: In the present study, sex was the only factor influencing the dimension of the sinus membrane, whereas patient age, season, and the endodontic status of neighboring teeth had no significant effect on the thickness of the antral mucosa. Future studies should address which types of mucosal thickening require interdisciplinary therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:587596. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3007

Full Text PDF File | Order Article


Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.


© 2018 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Author Guidelines
Submission Form
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us