LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 28 , Issue 1
January/February 2013

Pages 184189


A Retrospective Comparison of Implants in the Pterygomaxillary Region: Implant Placement with Two-Stage, Single-Stage, and Guided Surgery Protocols

Thomas J. Balshi, DDS, PhD, FACP/Glenn J. Wolfinger, DMD, FACP/Robert W. Slauch, BS/Stephen F. Balshi, MBE


PMID: 23377065
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2693

Purpose: Implants placed into the pterygomaxillary region allow for increased posterior support and a full complement of teeth without the need for distal cantilevers. With advancements in research and technology, implant delivery has evolved from the traditional two-stage procedure to immediate loading freehand and guided surgical template protocols. The purpose of this retrospective study is to determine if there is a significant difference in implant survival rates between these protocols. Materials and Methods: All pterygomaxillary implants placed in a single private practice from September 1985 to July 2011 were categorized into three separate classifications (two-stage freehand, single-stage freehand, or single-stage guided) by retrospective chart review. Life tables were constructed to determine the cumulative survival rates (CSR), and ANOVA was used to identify statistical significance. Results: A total of 981 patients comprising 371 males and 610 females were included in the study. Of all pterygomaxillary implants, 1,460 of 1,608 implants osseointegrated for a CSR of 90.80%. Seven hundred nine of the 825 two-stage, 624 of the 647 single-stage, and 127 of the 136 guided surgery implants osseointegrated for CSRs of 85.94%, 96.45%, and 93.38%, respectively. The comparison between two-stage and single-stage protocols was statistically significant, (P < .05) while the difference between single-stage guided versus freehand protocols was found to be statistically insignificant (P > .05). Conclusion: The results from this retrospective study reinforce that immediate loading of pterygomaxillary implants with a provisional prosthesis is beneficial to both doctor and patient. The lower CSR for the guided surgery protocol compared with the single-stage freehand procedure is statistically insignificant, suggesting guided surgery is still a viable and recommended option for qualified patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:184189. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2693

Key words: dental implants, immediate loading, guided surgery, tuberosity, osseointegration


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help