LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 27 , Issue 6
November/December 2012

Pages 1547–1553


Modified Surgical Protocol for Placing Implants in the Pterygomaxillary Region: Clinical and Radiologic Study of 454 Implants

Xavier Rodríguez, MD, PhD/Victor Méndez, DDS/Xavier Vela, MD, DDS/Maribel Segalŕ, MD, DDS


PMID: 23189309

Purpose: To review a series of 454 pterygoid implants placed more vertically than the previous standard angle (45 degrees) over a functional loading period ranging from 2 months to 14 years with a mean follow-up period of 6 years. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was made. The sample was composed of patients rehabilitated with pterygoid implants between January 1997 and December 2010. Patient selection criteria included: edentulism on the posterior area of an atrophic maxilla, with less than 8 mm remaining from the sinus floor to the alveolar crest, and the presence of an anterior implant or tooth to ensure mesial support for a partial denture. After a healing period between 2 and 7 months, panoramic x-rays were taken at the time of loading. The implant length, implant diameter, implant success, and the angulation of the pterygoid implants were measured. Results: Three hundred ninety-two patients (206 women and 186 men) ranging in age from 34 to 75 years were fitted with 454 pterygoid implants and followed up. The 18-mm implant length was the most favored implant to fit in the pterygoid area. Implant diameter was 3.75 mm in 448 cases (98.6%). The mean mesiodistal angulation of the pterygoid implants was 70.4 degrees ± 7.2. After a mean follow-up period of 6 years, 96.5% of the implants placed were successfully osseointegrated. Conclusions: The findings indicate that a mesiodistal inclination of the pterygoid implant at 70 degrees relative to the Frankfort plane following the bony column of the pterygoid region decreases the non-axial loads of the rehabilitations and exhibits good long-term survival; however, further studies are needed to assess the long-term survival of implants in the pterygomaxillary region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:1547–1553

Key words: atrophic maxilla, follow-up period, pterygoid buttress, pterygoid implant


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help