LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 27 , Issue 5
September/October 2012

Pages 12161222


Oral Bisphosphonates: Early Endosseous Dental Implant Success and Crestal Bone Changes. A Retrospective Study

Sayma Memon, DDS, MS/Robin L. Weltman, DDS, MS/James A. Katancik, DDS, PhD


PMID: 23057037

Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective chart-review study was to compare the early success rate and the crestal bone changes of dental implants in patients taking oral bisphosphonates at the time of implant placement to those of patients who had never taken bisphosphonates. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of 100 women (153 implants) taking oral bisphosphonates at the time of implant placement (test group) and 100 women (132 implants) who had never taken bisphosphonates (control group) was performed to examine overall implant success at the time of stage-two surgery. Radiographic images, which were available for 73 patients in each group and were taken at the time of implant placement and at stage-two surgery, were analyzed to assess and compare crestal bone changes around the implants. Results: There was no significant difference between groups in the success rates of dental implants at stagetwo surgery (test 93.5%, control 95.5%). The change in crestal bone height was statistically significant from the time of placement to stage-two surgery within both groups but was not significantly different between groups (means standard deviations: test, 0.66 0.70 mm; control: 0.80 0.65 mm). Conclusions: In this study, the use of oral bisphosphonates at the time of implant placement and during healing did not affect early implant success rates or crestal bone changes up to the time of stage-two surgery. In addition, the implant location and the duration of drug therapy at the time of placement were not significant factors in the success rate or bony changes. These conclusions must be viewed in the context of the limitations of the retrospective study design and should be confirmed in longer, more rigorously designed studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:12161222

Key words: bisphosphonates, dental implants


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help