LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 27 , Issue 4
July/August 2012

Pages e39-e48


Peri-implant Bone Remodeling Around an Extraction Socket: Predictions of Bone Maintenance by Finite Element Method


Hsuan-Yu Chou, MSc/Georgios Romanos, DDS, PhD, Dr Med Dent/Ali Müftü, DMD, PhD/Sinan Müftü, PhD


PMID: 22848899

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate peri-implant bone remodeling as a response to biomechanical factors, including implant size and contour, magnitude of occlusal load, and properties of osteogenic bone grafts through the use of a computational algorithm. Materials and Methods: A bone-remodeling algorithm was incorporated into the finite element method, where bone remodeling takes place as a result of the biomechanical alteration caused by dental implant placement and continues until the difference between the homeostatic state and the altered state is minimized. The site-specific homeostatic state was based on a model consisting of a natural tooth. Three long (11-mm) implants and two short (5-mm) implants were investigated. A three-dimensional segment of the mandible was constructed from a computed tomographic image of the premolar region, and an extraction socket was filled with bone graft. Results: Generally, the extent of bone loss in the cortical region was greater and denser bone developed at both the implant crest and apex with increased occlusal loads. The areas between implant threads were prone to bone resorption. Bone graft materials that were relatively stiff and that had high equilibrium stimulus values appeared to cause increased bone loss. Conclusions: Short implants are better for conserving the mechanotransductive signaling environment of the natural tooth than long implants. Also, short implants are predicted to lead to less interfacial bone loss at high loads over the long term, while long implants are associated with a more consistent level of bone loss for different amounts of loading. It is also predicted that in the long term, bone grafts with relatively low elastic modulus lead to lower levels of interfacial bone loss. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:e39–e48.

Key words: bone grafts, bone remodeling, dental implants, extraction socket, site-specific stimulus, wide implants


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help