LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 27 , Issue 3
May/June 2012

Pages 587-594


Evaluation of Guided Bone Regeneration with Poly(lactic Acid-Co-Glycolic Acid-Co-ε-Caprolactone) Porous Membrane in Lateral Bone Defects of the Canine Mandible

Goichi Matsumoto, DDS, PhD/Jyunichi Hoshino, DDS/Yasuhiko Kinoshita, DDS/Yoshihiko Sugita, DDS, PhD/Katsutoshi Kubo, DDS, PhD/Hatsuhiko Maeda, DDS, PhD/Hidetoshi Arimura, PhD/Syojiro Matsuda, PhD/Yoshito Ikada, PhD/Yukihiko Kinoshita, DDS, PhD


PMID: 22616052

Purpose: The aim of this study was to qualitatively evaluate a poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid-co-ε-caprolactone) (PLGC) membrane as a barrier for guided bone regeneration in the canine mandible and to compare it to a nonresorbable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane. Materials and Methods: Two wedge-shaped bone defects were created bilaterally in the mandibles of 12 beagle dogs. The bone defects in the left mandible were divided into three groups and treated as follows: PLGC membrane alone, PLGC membrane plus autogenous cortical bone chips, and titanium-reinforced expanded PTFE (TR-PTFE) membrane. The bone defects in the right mandible of each animal were left without membranes as a control. Computed tomography (CT) was performed at 3 and 6 months postoperative to evaluate bone regeneration. After a healing period of 6 months, the mandibles were removed en bloc for micro-CT and histologic analyses. Results: CT analyses at 3 and 6 months showed that there was significantly more bone augmentation at all experimental sites than at the control sites. The volume of bone at defect sites covered with TR-PTFE was significantly greater than at defect sites covered with PLGC membrane with or without autogenous cortical bone. Micro-CT measurements showed that the volume of new bone formed at sites covered with TR-PTFE was significantly greater than at sites covered with PLGC membrane. However, the density of new bone was significantly higher at sites covered with PLGC membrane, with or without cortical bone, than at sites covered with TR-PTFE. Histologic analysis verified the presence of well-vascularized loose connective tissue in the pores of the PLGC membrane. Conclusions: Compared to TR-PTFE, the macroporous bioresorbable PLGC membrane did not significantly increase the amount of new bone in defect sites, but it facilitated the regeneration of mature bone. INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 2012;27:587594.

Key words: guided bone regeneration, lateral ridge augmentation, poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid-co-ε-caprolactone), titanium-reinforced expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help