LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 27 , Issue 1
January/February 2012

Pages 4854


Relationship Between Subsinus Bone Height and Bone Volume Requirements for Dental Implants: A Human Radiographic Study

Dana Kopecka, MD, PhD/Antonin Simunek, MD, PhD/Tomas Brazda, MD/Martin Rota, MD/Radovan Slezak, MD, PhD/Lukas Capek, MSc, PhD


PMID: 22299078

Purpose: To analyze the vertical dimension of subsinus alveolar bone that is available for placement of endosseous implants. Materials and Methods: Subsinus alveolar bone height (SBH) was determined via radiographs and categorized into three groups: Group A corresponded to SBH < 5 mm; group B SBH of 5 to 9 mm; and group C, SBH > 9 mm. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Wilcoxon paired test with the threshold for statistical significance set at P < .05. Results: Five hundred eighty-three panoramic radiographs of edentulous maxillae were analyzed. In 96.9% of radiographs, the anterior border of the maxillary sinus was above the first premolar. Mean SBH values for canine, first premolar, second premolar, first molar, and second molar sites were 11.4 6.2 mm, 10.6 3.8 mm, 5.9 2.5 mm, 3.3 2.2 mm, and 4.5 2.4 mm, respectively. Representations of groups A, B, and C in the canine region were 14.3%, 21.4%, and 64.3%, respectively; in the first premolar region they were 8.3%, 22.3%, and 69.4%, respectively; in the second premolar region, these were 31.6%, 60.9%, and 7.5%, respectively; in first molar region, the values were 73.1%, 25.4%, and 1.5%, respectively; and in the second molar region they were 54.2%, 41.7%, and 4.1%, respectively. Conclusions: The mean SBH is the highest in the area of the anterior border of the sinus; it declines significantly toward the posterior maxilla, reaches its minimum in the area of the first molar, and increases again significantly in the second molar region. From a clinical point of view, the lateral window technique of sinus elevation remains the dominant augmentative procedure in the molar area, whereas in the premolar area, less invasive alternative methods may be more appropriate. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:4854

Key words: alveolar bone, bone height, dental implants, sinus elevation, sinus pneumatization


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help