LOGIN
 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 26 , Issue 6
November/December 2011

Pages 13441350


Optical Scan Analysis to Detect Minor Misfit on Implant-Supported Superstructures

Ali Tahmaseb, DDS, PhD/Peter Mercelis, PhD/Renaat de Clerck, DDS/Daniel Wismeijer, DDS, PhD


PMID: 22167442

Purpose: Despite the development of novel and more precise fabrication methods, absolute passive fit of implant-supported superstructures has yet to be consistently achieved. In the past, several laboratory techniques have been described to analyze fit. The purpose of this study was to assess two methods of fit evaluation with a control (well fitting) prosthesis and an intentionally misfit prosthesis. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, two comparable implant-supported superstructures (control and test misfit) were fabricated after scanning a test cast of a maxilla with four implants (two on each side). The test structure was fabricated with a known minor misfit on one of the inserted implants by manipulating the coordinates on the scanned files. The control superstructure was fabricated as accurately as possible without manipulating any scanned information. Both superstructures were evaluated using optical scanning and strain gauge measurements by an investigator who was blinded to the designed misfit. Results: Optical scanning demonstrated an accuracy of 10 m for the control frame, while the misfit frame demonstrated greater discrepancies, both at the intentionally misfit connection (connection #2, misfit of 29 m) and at the other connections (#1, 4 m; #3, 5 m; #4, 4 m), although the latter connections showed less misfit. The strain gauge measurement showed a higher mean deviation of 26.2 m ( 5.9 m) in the test model, versus 15.3 m ( 4.3 m) in the control model. Conclusion: Optical scan analysis was able to detect the misfit in the test superstructure and the manipulated implant. The strain gauge measurements confirmed these findings, indicating that both methods of assessing inaccuracy are effective. Optical scan analysis may be used as a simplified and clinically applicable method to detect minor misfits in implant-supported superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:13441350

Key words: implant superstructure, optical scan analysis, passive fit, prosthesis, prosthetic misfit, strain gauge


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2014 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc JOMI Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Accepted Manuscripts
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help